| sc94597 said: This argument is of the same form as the argument absolutists used against early liberals when they advocated for republicanism and representative democracy. "Rome and Greece failed, monarchy is the best form of government because the people need a sovereign to keep order. Do you want the war of all against all?" |
If the democratic and republican governments of Athens and Rome had produced results on par with the Soviet Union, then perhaps that would have been a good argument to make against making another attempt. For after all, if we do not learn from history, what is our other recourse? If I cannot point to the results of fascism as an argument why fascism is a bad idea, then how do we assess the claim that fascism deserves another try? I expect you might agree with regards to fascism, but socialism did just as much harm.
| sc94597 said:
There is quite a bit of diversity in socialist thought, and it does oneself a disservice to only understand and know about Marxist-Leninism. |
And yet the person I'm responding to was referring to Marx/Engels, and making Marxist talking points, etc. Besides which, it is a mistake to assume that I only understand or know about one version of socialism.
