mZuzek said:
...which they do because their games continue to sell. Companies lower prices because they want to keep sales going, Nintendo games don't always need price drops because they have legs (it's also exactly why the Switch will remain $300 for a long time). |
No one was claiming otherwise. But you were complaining why Nintendo was the only one not allowed to sell full price, while in fact the point is the opposite, but you would defend Nintendo on both accounts.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
