By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
quickrick on 01 February 2018
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
quickrick said:

i was talking about comparing exclusives to judge a power of a console, people will always have a different opinions, of whats technically more superior, and it''s impossible to prove someone wrong, as all takes is a resolution bump to 1080p, even for those games to give switch a hard time, for example DF thinks halo 4 stands up to any ps3 exclusive while many disagree, so all i'm saying it's best to judge consoles with multiplatofrm games to get a idea of there power.    

But it can be objectively proven that Switch is "technically more superior", since we know that 3GB of RAM is superior to <500MB and we know that Tegra X1 is superior to RSX and Xenos. Or if we use multiplatform titles as you say, FIFA and Skyrim show a substantial advantage on Switch.

d21lewis said:

That's the thing, though. Whenever a multiplat game runs poorly on my preferred console, I'm gonna yell "Lazy port!"

I'll never lose. Nobody ever backs down, really. They'll just believe what they want and what they want is to win.

Not necessarily. I mean, Doom on Switch has some performance issues, but I wouldn't call that a lazy port at all, I'd call it a high end PS4 game squeezed onto a mobile SoC, which necessitates some compromises. The term "lazy port" comes into play for me when a port clearly shows signs of being badly made even relative to its hardware, stuff like Bayonetta on PS3, or Arkham Knight on PC.

yea switch is clearly more superior. i consider wiiu/ps3/360 to be even with 360 being the best overall hardware, ports prove this, but as you can see in it's first year switch is running some of those games at 1080p with better graphics which those consoles can only dream of doing, yea of course switch is a nice leap, around 3x overall.