VGPolyglot said:
I'm giving you mass statistics while you're just giving anecdotal answers. Now, as to why people don't buy $500 cars, maybe it's because there aren't $500 cars for people to buy? https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/auto-industry/used-car-prices-reached-all-time-high-in-2016.html And again with your survivorship bias. Here's a good picture for you:
|
Some hard number that wasn't hard to find https://www.ebay.com/itm/2004-Saturn-Vue/323034555322?hash=item4b365c23ba:g:GCoAAOSws0JaZh5C&vxp=mtr
You call it survivor Bias, I call it depending on oneself instead of others. Lottery is random, effort isn't. But you may keep your world view if you so much prefer, while I'll keep looking at people that prefer short term gratification and when you look deeper have very expensive luxury but doesn't cover their basics because they will wait the government to do it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








