By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Angelus said:
vivster said:

Quality is certainly not subjective. However, no one ever says "The objective quality of the Witcher is some of the best in RPGs ever". However, quality is only one part of what makes a thing "the best" for someone. Quality isn't even an argument when certain elements you're looking for are completely missing or if there are specific flaws that turn you off completely.

Does the Witcher 3 have a certain level of quality above most other RPGs? Absolutely. Would I consider it among the best RPGs in my subjective opinion? Hell no.

I would say exactly that.

I think I understand what you're talking about though, because while Witcher 3 is classified as an RPG, I personally view it more as the world's most expansive action/adventure game that has RPG mechanics. You're looking for more pen and paper, classic RPG elements, I would guess.

Indeed. I'm missing a lot of the R in this supposed RPG. And no quality control could make up for that.

VGPolyglot said:
vivster said:

If their happiness is solely dependent on outside things it's actually pretty sad.

Well, happiness is heavily affected by your senses, which react to outside things.

Some things are easier to obtain and always around you, so you don't have to look very hard to find and make your happiness. I was rather talking about people who have very specific things needed to achieve happiness, things that are completely out of their control. For example other people or game consoles.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.