LudicrousSpeed said:
So just like I said, others are "baseless defending", but somehow your own unsubstantiated opinions with zero concrete numbers is not "baseless defending" lol. Also, this move was made like a day after the Game Pass stuff was announced by Microsoft. Hardly enough time to make any sort of informed business decision or conduct adequate research. Hell, the games aren't even in the program yet, lol. The person you quoted and told was "defending Microsoft" said stuff like this: Do you really need someone to post numbers to meet your "burden of proof" here? It all seems like extremely simply, logical stuff. Disagree with someone else all you want and voice your opinion, but don't act as if your opinion or point of view is any less "baseless" than his. |
When you attack the store decision as bad you better have anything to prove it. As much as someone saying game pass is a bad decision from MS should have something to base that on. So on the lack of any evidence supporting the criticism it default to think that the store isn't run by monkeys.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







