By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nymeria said:
DonFerrari said: 

Agree with most you said, would only say that 30% saving would be a good compromise, making like you said a part for rainy days (you saving that once just keep it unmoved with the amount that should go there going to long term or retirement). And depending of the country don't save for a house or car, keep that invested and pay rent..

Here you can have something like 10-15% annual interest on your saving if invested on safe means. So if you save 300k for housing that would net you 30-45k annually, while the rent of a property of this value would be around 20-25k annually. And in the case of the investment it is liquid and fast to move if you need while the house if you go on a finnancial problem is a very hard moving item.

While in USA it is like the opposite, the safe investment generating 2% a year while rent is quite high so buying a house takes precedence. Unfortunately people put a lot of other priorities in front of it and will live a life of debts.

I don't disagree, it is more a "Walk before you run" trying to help people plan finances.  When someone never saves it is an accomplishment to get them to set aside even $10 a week for starters just to get the idea in their head.  As a culture we are just not good at it, which is why many companies take the money out of the paycheck for retirement plans. If it was something people had to pay into on their own, they wouldn't do it nearly as much.

The challenge is balancing what is right in front of someone and what is long down the road over the horizon.  For example, in the US when you buy a home can pay for it over 15, 20, or 30 years. What is the most popular? 30 years, because it allows for the lowest monthly payment.  Of course in the long run it costs tens of thousands of dollars more in interest payments, and you'll be paying it off right up until retirement.  

Your 20s and 30s set your financial life for most people.  With proper planning you don't need to sacrifice much and will be set in your old age.  Every stumble such as forms of debt, interest, and penalties puts you in a deeper hole.  I foresee a lot of people having to work until the day they die due to poor planning.

The issue though is that the minimum wage is actually lower than the costs of living, so millions of people aren't even able to make enough money for the bare minimum, let alone even thinking about saving money:

https://www.citylab.com/life/2015/09/mapping-the-difference-between-minimum-wage-and-cost-of-living/404644/