By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 26 January 2018
Edit Thread
HoloDust said:
Chazore said:

The only place it has is in photography. Movies try to shove it in, but that only serves to blur the overall image quality and it's in no way "artistic" to do so for a movie. For photos it's the only real medium to use it, and sparingly.

To be honest, my photography days are some 25+ years in the past, but I don't quite see how something that is optical problem of the lens has any good purpose.

Some artistic photos can make good use of some "defects" and "unwanted" effects from some lenses... but that is quite out of the standard and serve specific purposes depending on the photo.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."