John2290 said:
Vr being labeled a gimmick is just wrong, I sense it is being labeled by people who haven't tried VR or at an early and perhaps limited capacity. I feel I need to call this out. The steering wheel industry is massive and far from resting on a gimmick, people but steering wheels the same reason they but dual analouge controllers to play three D games, it works better than any method. I hate using this quote but one Racing dev said this "You wouldn't use a keyboard to drive your car IRL?" As much as you may think Duel analouge is a good input method, it simply is not for racing titles. The steering wheel provides gameplay aspects you can not achive with any other tech, regardless of how many people buy them. I think you don't understand the word gimmick or have a twisted view from the last few years, perhaps. If by your standards everything added to mobile phones in the last decade is a gimmick yet you most likely use them daily if not weekly. Most of them you use without realizing. Is 4g a gimmick to sell phones? Is a high rez camera a gimmick or would you rather use a seperate phone, camera and laptop. Also, VR is not just a 3D box you slap on your face. I provides gameplay possibilities and aspects far beyond what the duel shock and 3d gaming has, may I ask have you tried a good decent or high end VR? With a variety of game genres? |
I have, and I was not impressed, because I (a) don't like motion controls and (b) get motion sickness very easily. But I'm not saying VR is bad. I'm saying it is by definition a gimmick.
Gimmick: (n) a trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business.
If a VR headset isn't a device intended to attract business, then what is it?







