If you like Dark Souls and are a multiconsole owner with a Switch, portability or 60fps?

[Miyamotoo]

deskpro2k3 said:

Miyamotoo said:

But what exactly few of your examples proof, you do realise that all you are examples are exceptions!? Are you really trying to say that games for Switch would had lower price point than PS4/XB1 if Switch games are not or cartridges!? Talking about price of cartridges (flash memory), Vita/3DS games are on cartridges and their price point is $40 compared to $60 on home consoles.

Like wrote, fact is that regular price point for AAA game on Wii/PS3/360/WiiU was $60, now its same price point for PS4/XB1/Switch. Again, with your point on mind, why same games on XB1 dont have lower price point compared to PS4, or why same games on Pro/X dont have higher price point compared to PS4/XB1,  simple beacuse graphics/performance of multiplatform games never effects on price point of those games.

 

omg enough with your whataboutism. You'll never see a Vita game cost as much or more than a home console game.

Pro/X consoles itself cost more than the original PS4/XB1 consoles.. I already explained this.

I think we reach full circle here, you can find my points backed up with facts in later posts.

/end

But why would on earth Vita game cost more than home console game when Vita is just a handheld and price point of big Vita games is $40 same like it is for 3DS, not $60 like its case for XB1/PS4/Switch!?

Again poing that dont make any sense, price point of hardware dont have anuthing with price point of games, Switch has same price point like XB1/PS4, Wii had much lower price point than PS3 and also had same price point of $60 for games.

Basically everything you wrote is wrong and don't make any sense, few examples that are exceptions dont change nothing.

Last edited by Miyamotoo - on 23 January 2018