outlawauron said:
quickrick said:
I know ps3 was more over all more powerful, but i really doubt the cpu was such a huge advantage, even the most talented dev's like rock star with huge budget couldn't get games to run better on ps3, it was just really shit designed hardware when the best devs can't even take advantage of it, even after many years 360 multiplats usually had a advantage, but early on it made ps3 look like shit. imo if most games don't run better then the console really doesn't deserve to be called more powerful.
|
I mean, that's not really true. When games were designed for PS3 first, then ported to 360, performance drastically improved. The 360 to PS3 ports were awful. I remember Oblivion being delayed like 9 months because they wanted to get it working properly.
|
even when games were lead on ps3, 360 games till were on par or sometimes better like DMC4, and metal gear rising, along with dead space.what does that tell you? 360 was better designed hardware, and came out a year earlier.
