nanarchy said:
being slightly more stable than fiat currencies that have collapsed is hardly a selling point, that is like saying my shit stinks slightly less than my neighbours a currency needs stability to get acceptance and adoption. Laundering is still a huge issue, yes it is only semi anonymous but when combined with tumbler services and poorly regulated exchanges you can overcome the not anonymous part to launder money. new fad, have not really seen that argument, but yes agree there. Proof of work is simply a bad model, especially when some of them use far more sustainable models. |
It's a huge selling point in many other nations; saying that it's not is a projectionist argument. Go tell people in Venezuela and Zimbabwe that their currency stinks, and they should just have to deal with it.
Laundering is an issue, in so far as there is any invested investigative effort: that's the case for BTC, but not all cryptos (I'm not a fan of ICOs, as a rule.).
It's only a fad, if you talk about the speculation involved. The underlying technology and usage is well beyond the experimental stages. The PoW is a huge component, as debit and credit fraud are rampant, and a PoS company had shutdown all payments yesterday.