SpokenTruth said:
o_O.Q said:

lmao dude there is a difference but the point is that i don't think and i'm sure the whole scientific community agrees with me that the current laws we have are perfect

they are subject to change over time as we learn more... sure they may not but we have to be open to the possibility which you amusingly enough are not, meaning you are anti-science

Did Relativity rewrite classical mechanics?  Do we still not use them?  Do they not mathematically describe the common large object, low speed physics? 

Or did Relativity add to it?  Expand upon it?  Mathematically explain areas that classical mechanics did not account for? 

 

"Did Relativity rewrite classical mechanics?  Do we still not use them?  Do they not mathematically describe the common large object, low speed physics? ..."

this is irrelevant to what i'm saying... how could you possibly not see that lol

 

can you know for sure that everything put forward in classical mechanics and relativity is completely infallible and will never be rethought in the future... you should if you understand science

why are you treating this like a religion? aren't you against religion? lol