SpokenTruth said:
o_O.Q said:

"You're right. It is religion that makes people to do that."

but atheists kill people too right?

Can you show me the passage in the atheists doctrine that directs atheists to kill people?

We'll wait while you find it.

o_O.Q said:

 

"They won't be rewritten but added to."

you can't know that for certain since they might have to rethink certain aspects as they move forwards, that's a possibility... or they may just realise that they don't exist...

 

"That doesn't require faith."

to me it does when you don't even have any evidence that they exist, which they don't

I can know that for certain.  And the fact you suggest the laws of Newtonian physics and the laws of quantum mechanics may need to be rewritten and not just expanded on tells me that you are not well versed on the subject.  You are arguing from ignorance and incredulity.  Just because YOU don't know doesn't mean that others don't know.  It's faith to you because you don't know enough otherwise.

 

"Can you show me the passage in the atheists doctrine that directs atheists to kill people?"

you're answering my question with a question? do atheist kill people or not?

 

"the fact you suggest the laws of Newtonian physics and the laws of quantum mechanics may need to be rewritten and not just expanded on tells me that you are not well versed on the subject."

strawman

i said that singularities are not currently accommodated in our physics laws

i then said that two possibilities are t(1)hat singularities may not exist and (2)that we may have to change our current laws of physics (furthermore i didn't say that these are the only possibilities )

 

the idea you are pushing that there is only one path with regards to this problem - that singularities exist and we simply have to add to our laws of physics to include them is actually the silliest idea i've heard so far... let me reiterate this so you get it... we do not know yet if they even exist in a practical sense, got it yet?

 

" You are arguing from ignorance and incredulity.  "

 

only because you are attacking a strawman though ( and even the strawman you attacked is a possibility since it is possible that our physics laws are not perfect, this stance as someone graciously pointed out previously is anti-science )

Last edited by o_O.Q - on 16 January 2018