"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important."

[WolfpackN64]

Peh said:

WolfpackN64 said:

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/agnostic

"Some of us are believers, others are agnostics or atheists."

"Until I can do so I am not an atheist, but an agnostic."

"All individuals (believers, agnostics or atheists) will naturally have a mixture to varying degrees, and they will differ across cultures."

Every single example treats Agnosticism as a third position. Clearly, you've been misinterpreting this definition.

.... those have little to do with the definition in itself, arf. Those are just example sentences you can catch online, arf. 

See also in the example sentences on atheism, arf:

"‘No matter how strenuously some may try to deny it, atheism is a belief system.’" ,arf

There, right out contradicts what the definition is saying, arf. 

You can copy that one above into google search and it shows you where it was taken from:

http://www.letusreason.org/apolo7.htm ,arf

"Christianity has nothing to fear from atheism or agnosticism." ,arf

So, should I consider this a fact now, arf? 

I'm sorry, but, those aren't facts, nor what the dictionary says, arf. You got it wrong, arf.

In that case, the dictionary gives neither conclusive evidence to me, nor to you.

We're both right and both wrong. Isn't that wonderful?