OhNoYouDont said:
o_O.Q said:
"ANY consequence resulting from technology use is EXTRINSIC as it does not concern the nature of what the thing is"
the definition of extrinsic is as follows
"not part of the essential nature of someone or something; coming or operating from outside"
" not forming part of or belonging to a thing"
if you can't see how hilariously stupid your argument was now... we might as well put a stop to it here
to put a finer point on it, pollution for example does not come from a source outside of technology, it is a derivation of technology
intrinsic : "Of or relating to the essential nature of a thing."
anyone who understand what technology is understands that an ever present part of technology is waste
that's where the concept of "efficiency" comes from and no machine is 100% efficient there is always some percentage of the input that comes out as waste and that waste almost always is harmful to people and the environment
"Stop embarrassing yourself."
lmao right back at you
|
Read those definitions again, slap yourself in the face for your intransigence and then get a clue. Is this guy seriously this incompetent? His own definitions establish his extra chromosome. FFS
|
"intrinsic : "Of or relating to the essential nature of a thing.""
waste is a part of the essential nature of technology... lol were you not aware of that?
dunning-kruger indeed lol