By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot on 14 January 2018
Edit Thread
Nem said:
Azuren said:

Well, the point of your post is fundamentally wrong on just a definitions standpoint, so there isn't much point in addressing anything else you said. It's clear you just want it to mean a certain thing, and that's fine if you want to do that, but try not to make assumptions about other people just because you're upset about not having a leg to stand on.

You were wrong. Your definition of atheism was wrong and even your excuse of the latin meaning was wrong as arfy just told me in the previous page. And btw terms don't define themselves, we do.

Your replies for the last 5 or 6 pages have been /pout after that. I made no assumption except you are poisoned with religious definitions. It's a fact, wether you are atheist or theist.

For example VG is an Atheist but his concepts are still unclear or influenced by religion. This is an educational problem at large in the US from what i know.

I'm not a good teacher. I know the logic and i know what's real and how to determine it. I did not learn specifically how to decode the way people think incorrectly and help them fix it. I apolgise, i wish i had that talent, but theres many books and atheists to talk with that will do a better job at explaining these things and i vehemently recommend them.

I only went to Kindergarten in the US though. I don't believe in God, an afterlife, fate, etc. However, what we are not arguing is whether or not atheism is a real position or concept, we are disagreeing fundamentally of what atheism is. How are you going to expect a baby with no concept of god to explain what atheism is? And that is why it is important to have knowledge of the subject. How can you be an atheist if you don't even know what atheism is or means? (By the way I'm not saying this personally to you, I'm talking of your definition where someone who doesn't have the concept of it can still somehow be one).