Azuren said:
Nem said:
What religious stance you have is IRRELEVENT. Your definition of Atheism was wrong and that means you were tought wrongly from a religious influence in your learning system. You defined Atheism as the belief that there is no God. It was bolded even. That is WRONG! You can squirm all you want and claim that i am wrong, but any respectable dictionary search will prove me right.
None of my claims are my opinions. They are facts. I might not be able to express them clearly in a way you can understand but they are. What do you want me to say when people didn't have the education they deserve so they have the means to properly rationalise these things? I don't make up knowledge. This is NOT a battle of opinions. This is not me saying "i" think this is how it works. I am not a scientist nor are any of you as far as i can tell. Facts are not opinions. They are scientific conclusions. I am sharing the conclusions that are proven true and logical. If you can't understand or refuse to understand what do you want me to do? Give you an "F"? I blame the obvious reason as to why you don't have the necessary faculties (religion).
But the good news is, it can be overcome. It requires studying and in some cases good teachers though.
If this offends you, i am sorry, but i am an honest person, wich is also a flaw. I don't sugar coat things.
|
Paraphrasing the same stance over and over doesn't make you right, it makes you stubborn. The only part of your statements that are factual is that, by definition, facts can be proven wrong. And considering you believe Agnosticism and Atheism are the same thing (something that has already been shown to not be true), yes. I suppose they are factual. Factually incorrect.
|
Wow... this official means you are living in "koo-koo" world. Guess what? If a fact is proven wrong, it's not a fact. You are a walking contradiction sir.
Also, no, Atheism and Agnosticism aren't the same thing. One says something over wether you believe something and the other over if you know something to be true. The position they reflect in face of the god preposition is what is the same. Wether you say you have no belief for god or if you say you cant know if he is real, you are saying the same thing.
How difficult is this stuff to understand eh? You should try physics, it will blow your head away.
