By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NawaiNey on 14 January 2018
Edit Thread
Player2 said:
NawaiNey said:

I don't game on handhelds and therefore don't really care about what anyone's doing on those systems. Like I said just make a separate topic for the handhelds. Plus the release times of the handhelds can be years off from the consoles, so it's really hard to align the generations, it's hard enough with 360 being a year early from PS3/Wii, and WiiU being a year early from PS4/XB1. 

Now adding the 3DS to this gen would mean Nintendo has almost 3 years of lead time on MS/XB1 with the 3DS and another year of WiiU, and that's just a ridiculous comparison at that point.

3DS? They're asking you to add DS and PSP games to the first post. Those are relevant because the sequels of the first party games of those systems will be on consoles you're going to compare.

Then I would also have to add 3DS and VITA to this gen...and Have chosen to leave them all out and keep this about consoles. And for the 3rd time you are all free to make a separate topic about handhelds. I just don't want to do that as it will make the comparison extremely unfair for MS. Just because Sony and Nintendo choose to split their resources between multiple markets is not MS' fault. I have also omitted PSVR titles from this list as they can't be played on these consoles without buying additional hardware, and just because Sony is deciding to spend resources that they could use to make PS4 games on PSVR is not MS or Nintendo's problem.