| o_O.Q said:
you have not provided evidence that scientists have modeled a singularity despite claiming they have |
You are completely clueless about science, the scientific method and how a model is built. - That's the only reply I can give that useless statement of yours.
| o_O.Q said: all you did was state that it was peer reviewed lol how is this mutually exclusive to what i said? whether its peer reviewed or not its still an article |
It is not the same thing written on a napkin.
| o_O.Q said: i'm not surprised that you can't back your claim... you're showing a pattern lol |
You have provided zero evidence to substantiate any of your claims in the history of this thread.
I think it is safe to say, that I am right and you are wrong until you make the effort to do so.
| o_O.Q said:
ok since you're either dishonest or ignorant i'll clarify that a secular country is one where religion and the state are kept separate and people are free to practice whatever religion they wish whereas an atheist country is one where religion is outlawed an example would be the soviet union when asked to provide examples of atheists countries that have promoted human rights you struggled because presumably you didn't understand what that means
|
No. Stop with your rubbish goal post shifting. - I answered a question. The question was... "Did I stutter and say there was no difference?"
| o_O.Q said: when i asked this earlier you provided a whole bunch of links and claimed that they verified your claim |
Because they did. You have only provided your own baseless opinion.
I don't have a faith-based system, I require evidence... And thus I will not take the claims of some random person on the Internet that I have never and will never meet at face value because... I am not gullible.
| o_O.Q said: lol you don't think any aspect of evolution can be debated and you think i'm anti science? lol this has been amusing |
All science is up for debate. It's what science is about.
But that wasn't what I was asking.
You disbelieve in many aspects of science. - You don't believe in the scientific process and belittle it at every chance you get, well guess what? The smartest minds in all of human history back the scientific method because it works, people that are smarter than you.
Fact is, you are anti-science... Do you know who else is anti-science? People who don't believe that man ever went to the moon. (There is evidence for that.) - Or people who believe the Earth is Flat (Because the Bible says so.) - Or people who believe that Vaccines are toxic. (Despite eliminating entire diseases.)
That is the kind of people you are being lumped in with.
| Peh said: I'm very sorry, arf. I wasn't expecting this level of immature respond to be honest, arf. I just pointed out the obvious insult towards theists and your baseless claim, arf. But don't worry, I know you don't, I will take a note for future posts on this board about that, arf. |
I wasn't being immature, I was being brutally honest.
| o_O.Q said: i'm not saying that's the case all the time but clearly when the laws of physics are broken and need to be rewritten for something to be verified ( as is the case with singularities ) then there is some degree of faith involved the hypothesis i believe is that singularities are points in space where gravity/mass become infinite |
...Are you serious?
Your suggestion is batshit crazy.
The laws of Physics represent the sum of all our knowledge in regards to the natural world. - It is backed by mathematics, science, working models, repeatable tests and intimate studies. - And you want to toss it away because you disagree with it?
| o_O.Q said: you know nothing about my view of the world and i'm not surprised that you had to bow out, you put in a good effort though btw "At least I have the balls to admit when I'm wrong " i thought you said you didn't have balls ;) |
We know enough to understand your line of thinking, you have been clear in your reasoning.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
