"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important."

[WolfpackN64]

Nem said:

WolfpackN64 said:

You can twist and turn what I meant all you want. All it goes to show is that you don't really care about the linguistics. That and your definition of agnosticism was largely skewed anyway. So if we can't "make up definitions" as you put it, you'd still be wrong.

And don't bore us with a

Oh you got it wrong. You are the one projecting religious people as the people of the world with the power to make up and change the meaning of words. Religious people are only a sub-set of people. You don't have that power and the atempts just end up as humor to the rest of the civilised world.

I do care about linguistics. But what you are talking about is, as usual for religion, to give special treatment for a few. Wich the rest of us reply with a clear: NO! You are not special cause you are grown people who believe some fairy tail book and you will not receive special treatment. 

You're the one pushing a wrong interpretation of the word agnosticism. So far, I've only been defending my case through reason and philosophical arguments. You're not made of teflon, you don't get to just assume you're right and ignore my arguments because you feel like it.

You don't get extra powers over language because you're an atheist. Special treatment works both ways. And I'd watch your words or I'm going to stuff the whole Silmarillion where the sun doth not shineth if you'd like a fairy tale book.