By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Genos8 said:
DonFerrari said:

Talk about ignoring kkkk. I read all you said, and you have just said what you said before and have zero proof of it. The price dialed back from 199 to 299 is enough reason to explain the drop in sales. The PS4Pro launching in the previous year is another. You were the one that ignored arguments and even reason because you are just sure Switch is stealing the thunder from PS4, but only in December since it have been up YOY up until December and it didn't come up for December.

it was down for the holidays period as a whole. The unusual 199 pricetag shifted sales from december into november, otherwise we would have seen dec > nov as usual but the sum is what counts.

By the whooping 300k that is easily explained by PS4Pro release and the price hike that didn't only shift sales to November, but also losing normal December sales.  Because you can't put PS4 selling less in December as the responsibility of Switch when for the other 9 months Switch was out it didn't impact PS4 in any manner you can prove.

So more than no one can prove Switch have no impact you can't prove that it does have a major impact.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."