d21lewis said:
I'd argue that the Vita failed because it didn't have a lot of "must play" games and the memory cards cost way too much (and the console had ZERO usable built in memory). At the same time, it still had the features in the OP packed into a $250-$300 device back in 2012. And, in the plus side, the Switch is confirmed to get many new features in the near future, too. |
Nah PSP was a beast cause it launched before phones.
Before smart phones I used my PSP for everything, i.e. music, videos as did most my friends. I would never leave home wthout it. I reckon 90% of my time on the PSP was the media functionality.
Now with a phone I do all that and more on it.
With my VITA all i do is play games with it and that's been a while now.
WIth my smart phone I cna now link to the TV to play 1080p videos too so no need for my switch to do all that.
Saying all this I have no objection in what you think the switch needs. Everyone is different but for most people they can't live without the smart phone being less than a meter away from them lol.
The practical things like themes, folders etc I think everyone would love to see.







