o_O.Q said:
i'll repeat it again... i don't understand how a qualified social scientist is saying the nonsense you are saying in this thread
you're literally siding with someone who for one denies the meaning of the word practitioner and secondly who denies that greed and ignorance are qualities that all people possess including the subsection that actively practice science (which i said originally)
i mean your refutation is like me saying humans give birth to live young and then you saying that because i didn't say mammals then what i said isn't true its mindbogglingly nonsensical
in fact, lets test this - is the statement "humans give birth to live young" false or not? |
I, and Hedra42 for that matter, didn't say any of these things. I'm not letting myself get dragged into your swamp of lies and twisted words. You know you are backed into a corner, that's why you try to (unsuccessfully) weasel yourself out of all the moronic things you said. That's the whole reason this non-discussion is about semantics now instead of the potentially interesting but ultimately pointless and vacant topic.
Rol, who you should know is the mental coach of each and everyone around here, tells me to keep fighting but I'm getting tired of it. It's pointless. You probably just enjoy to see how far you can go acting like a dimwit. You may lack any kind of debating or intellectual skills, but I am impressed with your persistence to make a fool out of yourself. You do have more stamina than me, I'll give you that.
Bye bye now!
