Pemalite said:
Peh said:
You are aware that you just labeled all theists on this planet who are also praying as idiots, arf?
Also: "Besides, even if a theistic deity did hypothetically exist, said deity would not interfere in the affairs of man anyway, making the entire process completely and utterly a waste of time." ,arf.
You mean deism, arf? Also, that is a claim made by you which you need to provide proof for, arf.
|
You are confusing me with someone who actually cares.
o_O.Q said:
lmao give me a direct quote where a scientist has claimed that they have modeled a singularity from the hadron collider... all you're doing is dodging by using various links that describe their expectations
i already know you can't but i suppose i'm waiting for you to admit that you're wrong
it kind of shows too that you don't really understand what a singularity is, but lets see where this goes
|
No. I provided evidence, which is better than a Quote.
And no. It is not dodging, dodging would be providing no evidence at all. - Rather, hows about you make a basic effort and read the information I provided, watch the video from Bryan Cox who is a Physicist... And try your very best to comprehend it? It's not hard.
I am not your slave, if you want a quote, get one of your own from the information I provided.
And if I am wrong, you need to provide evidence for it, which you haven't done once, otherwise this discussions is one way in my favor.
o_O.Q said:
yeah you did, that's what you told me, whether its peer reviewed or not, its still an article right? lol
|
I provided evidence that said I didn't.
o_O.Q said:
which one and how so? |
Pick one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
o_O.Q said:
i really have to prove that there's a different between an atheist country and a secular country? do you understand what both terms mean? |
Did I stutter and say there was no difference? There is a difference, but there is overlap.
o_O.Q said:
uh... what the fuck? did you not in this very post provide links you claim prove that they have modeled a singularity with the hadron collider?
i can't provide evidence for that because you're wrong
|
I also provided information on what the scientific method entails, go read it instead of making false accusations.
And I never once stated they modeled a singularity but they have a working model of the singularity, which is in the evidence I provided prior. Do keep up.
o_O.Q said:
i think certain aspects of it are debateable |
Then you truly are anti-science and anti-evidence... And debating with you about the scientific method will go absolutely nowehere, you already have a confirmation bias.
pleaserecycle said:
The LHC and other particle colliders are used to observe characteristics of elementary particles like quarks, leptons, etc.. Although these properties are significant after the Big Bang, they aren't supporting or debunking the mathematical singularity.
|
Correct. And I never asserted otherwise.
The Big Bang was a process and the LHC is explaining a part of that process and so is the CMB.
They are all part of a working model which is what I am trying to drum into that posters brain.
***********
I will be gone for a about 3-4 days, I will only have my mobile device (And screw using this forum on a mobile device! Haha), so I won't be posting. I'll get back to it as soon as possible.
|
"No. I provided evidence, which is better than a Quote.
And no. It is not dodging, dodging would be providing no evidence at all."
you have not provided evidence that scientists have modeled a singularity despite claiming they have
"I provided evidence that said I didn't."
all you did was state that it was peer reviewed lol how is this mutually exclusive to what i said? whether its peer reviewed or not its still an article
"Pick one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies"
i'm not surprised that you can't back your claim... you're showing a pattern lol
"Did I stutter and say there was no difference?"
ok since you're either dishonest or ignorant i'll clarify that a secular country is one where religion and the state are kept separate and people are free to practice whatever religion they wish
whereas an atheist country is one where religion is outlawed
an example would be the soviet union
when asked to provide examples of atheists countries that have promoted human rights you struggled because presumably you didn't understand what that means
"And I never once stated they modeled a singularity"
when i asked this earlier you provided a whole bunch of links and claimed that they verified your claim
"Then you truly are anti-science and anti-evidence..."
lol you don't think any aspect of evolution can be debated and you think i'm anti science? lol this has been amusing
