Which Is A Bigger Threat To Humanity? Science Or Religion?

[o_O.Q]

Pemalite said:

o_O.Q said:

 

can you link me to something where scientists claim they've been able model a singularity using the hadron collider?

Are you trolling? Legitimate question.
Because if you have to ask that... Then you have completely missed the point of smashing particles together.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider#Purpose
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collider
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-11711228
http://www.exploratorium.edu/origins/cern/ideas/bang2.html
https://mic.com/articles/114664/the-biggest-machine-in-the-world-could-reveal-the-secrets-of-the-universe#.MBG4exPDS

o_O.Q said:

 

did you not just tell me that you believe in CMB because you read an article?

I didn't just read an "article". - Clearly you don't understand what peer review is and why it is important.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_journal

o_O.Q said:

 

so therefore we can exclude religious people? since they would claim that their books are evidence right? you're pushing a poor argument

Correct. And you want to know why we can exclude their religious books?
Because their religious books are the claim and not evidence. - Again, read above on the importance of Peer Review/Scientific Journal.

o_O.Q said:

 

and religious people would claim that they have their bible

and back in the day archaeologists would have said they had piltdown man (before it was proven to be a fake)

This is a logical fallacy.

o_O.Q said:

 

in the future they'll say that about the doctors we have now... what does that tell you?

That the Scientific method works. - Not everything we know today will be rendered as false in the future either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

o_O.Q said:

 

no there's a big difference

Prove it.

o_O.Q said:

 

says the guy that thinks you can model a singularity lol

That is your assertion, not mine.
I have provided evidence for my claims, you need to stop being ignorant and start doing the same.

o_O.Q said:

 

what makes you say that?

Your lack of understanding of basic science?
Schools exist for a reason.

my next question is thus. Do you believe in the theory of evolution and natural selection?

"Are you trolling? Legitimate question."

lmao give me a direct quote where a scientist has claimed that they have modeled a singularity from the hadron collider... all you're doing is dodging by using various links that describe their expectations

i already know you can't but i suppose i'm waiting for you to admit that you're wrong

it kind of shows too that you don't really understand what a singularity is, but lets see where this goes

 

"I didn't just read an "article"

yeah you did, that's what you told me, whether its peer reviewed or not, its still an article right? lol

 

"Because their religious books are the claim and not evidence."

yes and that's your perspective and from their perspective they'd disagree with you

 

"This is a logical fallacy."

which one and how so?

 

"Prove it."

i really have to prove that there's a different between an atheist country and a secular country? do you understand what both terms mean?

 

"That is your assertion, not mine.

I have provided evidence for my claims, you need to stop being ignorant and start doing the same."

uh... what the fuck? did you not in this very post provide links you claim prove that they have modeled a singularity with the hadron collider?

i can't provide evidence for that because you're wrong

 

"Your lack of understanding of basic science?

Schools exist for a reason."

lol which incorrect assertion have i made about science?

 

"my next question is thus. Do you believe in the theory of evolution and natural selection?"

i think certain aspects of it are debateable