Carl2291 said:
There's as much proof for the Xbox statement as there is for the PlayStation statement. The overall point is that it didn't happen, it couldn't happen and the only reason it's being brought up is to protect peoples feelings on which company is apparently bigger than another one. Like I said, it's embarrassing. |
PS3 tying with X360 and being less than 15M bellow Wii suggest strongly that launching for 200 USD less it would pass both, sustained by Sony dominating on PS1,2 and 4. Much more than X1 launching for 299 would cover the 2:1 difference against PS4.
You are basically saying that if one change of 100 USD for the base PS3 would improve PS3 sales by 20-25% it should also do 100% for X1, that is what would be embarassing.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."