By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
DonFerrari said:

Still that wasn't the argument he was making on that point and strictly on price point he wasn't being ridiculous to infer that at the right price PS3 would win. And changing BD to DVD and Cell to common architeture wouldn't make PS3 less PS3, because the SW would still come similarly.

BD and Cell were a bad gamble on the cost reduction perspective.

Change BD and Cell then it isn't the PS3, it's a different machine.

"The PS3 would have won if it didn't have BD and Cell and launched at $399!"

"The Xbox One would be winning if they didn't pull anti-consumer practices and launched at $299."

It's all bollocks. It's embarrassing.

Nope X1 wouldn't win even launching at 299 and you know it, case in point... X360 launched earlier, cheaper, with better infra, better performance on MP and still lost to Sony being more expensive, etc... PS Brand is clearly over MS and on consoles even Nintendo.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."