| eva01beserk said: You dint even bother clicking the link did you? Did you even read any of it? How about the response already made when he replied? You dint did you? But I will give you points on something, while everything the other guys said is still on topic, going from quality to quantity is just moving the goalpost. Something the green team are no strangers to. |
Of course I clicked the link, how else would I be giggling about how wrong you were? Since you still seem utterly confused even after I broke it down in my last post (in about 1/10th the text it took you to as well, accuracy and efficiency ftw), let me try again. You posted a link to a guy replying to a guy who was replying to a guy, but you didn't go back deep enough.
This is actually where the relevant discussion begins, right here. You have someone saying Microsoft has provided no quality content. Now, notice in Zoom's post it doesn't say "hardly any quality content", it doesn't say "almost no quality content", it doesn't say "without providing quality content in 2017", it says Microsoft has provided zero quality content. So Puppy replies listing some uh, you know, quality content Microsoft has actually provided, proving him wrong.
The post you linked, mistakenly assuming it's where the exchange begins, is actually where the goal posts begin to be shifted, and where the irrelevant pissing contest console warz starts coming into play. What time span it took for those good games to come out, and what Nintendo did in one year, are entirely irrelevant. As is a Metacritic breakdown of 2017.
Please do reply if you're still hung up on any of this, you said you've followed the thread so closely yet are so far off, I really want to make sure you're all caught up buddy.
Also, lol @ green team. This is your brain on console warz.
