Veknoid_Outcast said:
We don’t agree often, but this is exactly my line of thinking :) Currently, many mainstream critics treat 7.5 as the average, when it should be 5 (or 5.5 if 0 is out of the equation). |
Well I guess we can agree every now and then.
And it comes to what OP pointed as one point... we have seem some good games rated as average (75-80, which should equate good) and bad games that are rated 65-70... the point system is very inflated...
In the end we have to go and consider that the scale starts on the 50 and that the 75 is for mixed/average... it's a little confusing.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
