WhatATimeToBeAlive said:
"i've said it before and i'll say it again, i do not buy the coverage of the ukraine conflict that is being pushed... so don't bother with it" So you don't buy the coverage stated in those links I posted? Why is that? They contain the Russian narrative, so you shouldn't have a problem with them. One of them for example shows a satellite image that shows how a fighter jet shoots at a passenger plane. The only problem is that the image is fake (the plane in the image would be about 1 km long in real life, because they fucked up the scale) and Russia itself has already abandoned that narrative. There is no obvious truth about who is behind the chemical attacks in Syria, but majority of the evidence points to Syrian government who have/had those weapons and the planes used to deliver them. Russia for example vetoed an initiative in the UN that would have allowed a proper examination of the latest chemical attack (in addition to that plane-incident mentioned above). But all this aside, you haven't answered the main points: How does it justify the wrongdoigns of a country if some other country has also done bad things? and Why do you defend dictatorships and bash democracies?
Or will you come up with something like this: "North Korea is in reality a good place to live and the people there have the ability to influence how the country is run. But South Korea on the other hand is more like a dictatorship and the people there live in a lie."
You must have it all figured out. Can I be part of your "wice club"? 9/11 was an inside job (jet fuel can't smelt steel beems). Did I get it right? |
"So you don't buy the coverage stated in those links I posted? Why is that?"
because there's evidence of the united states plotting to put a puppet leader in the ukraine as they have in iraq, in lybia, etc etc etc
meaning that just as they have allied themselves with rebel groups in those areas to overthrow the government, evidence points to them doing so with regards to this situation also
"There is no obvious truth about who is behind the chemical attacks in Syria, but majority of the evidence points to Syrian government who have/had those weapons and the planes used to deliver them."
...so you ignored the links i posted? lol
even the us admits it was the rebels... wtf lol
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-22/us-now-admits-syrian-rebels-have-used-chemical-weapons
and they admit that the rebels were ISIS supporters WAKE UP!
"How does it justify the wrongdoigns of a country if some other country has also done bad things?"
it does not but to compare the us destroying like 8 countries in the past year to a single conflict between russia and ukraine (which the united states has a part in anyway ) is ridiculous lol
to even try to compare the two shows a ridiculous amount of delusion
"Why do you defend dictatorships and bash democracies?"
now you're making laugh, you probably don't even realise that democracies often evolve into dictatorships... that you present the two terms as if they are polar opposites is hilarious to me
but regardless what dictators? lybia was one of the richest countries in the region for example... are you aware of its current state?
are you aware of the current state of iraq? etc etc etc
hasn't the united states been the worst dictator of all time to these countries by killing their people and destroying their infrastructure?
do you know why they call assad a cruel dictator? because of the chemical attacks that they framed him for
with regards to saddam i already posted a link showing that the CIA colluded with him on some of the attacks he waged against his people
with regards to Qaddafi i'm quite sure that the some type of framing occured there also because anyone who is being rational can see an obvious pattern
" North Korea is in reality a good place to live and the people there have the ability to influence how the country is run."
i don't know the history, but i wouldn't be surprised if north korea started out as a democracy
