Twitter statement reveals why it won't ban Trump over his controversial tweets

[DonFerrari]

ArchangelMadzz said:

DonFerrari said:

Errrrrr, Churchill and Eisenhower used radio to do war talk and that basically involved action and killing against other countries... but sure we are the generation that Trump threatening to torch some people is worse than Eisenhower dropping 2 nukes on a country...

Yes I do use facebook and am part of several groups where they monitor a lot of hate speechs done by "liberals" that get answers with not being against the policies but posts that use a specific word or another on subject involving minorities are hammered down...

Perhaps you need to break from your bubble on facebook.

And if they were tweeting their threats then they should be banned from Twitter too. You could've placed my response there on your own. 

Jeez that really shouldn't have surprised me but it did.. 

But again you're not actually reading what I'm saying. I said that I see hate speech all the time on Facebook without anything being done about it. Not that it doesn't happen. 

I didn't place your response because my point wasn't about your opinion on all deserving a ban (which is what their ToS would say) against my opinion that all should be allowed to say what they want and if they break a law they should be jailed, I was pointing out that the movements that usually push for the bands of people like Trump would condone Bernie saying something equivalent. But since you didn't agree or disagree with it there was no point putting your response.

What type of hate speech you have been seem not being taken care of at all?