Twitter statement reveals why it won't ban Trump over his controversial tweets

[DonFerrari]

JWeinCom said:

DonFerrari said:

And I'm talking about the people that ask for the bans of Drumpf (not he) but doesn't for other groups/person with equally damaging speech but since it aligns with their beliefs/political orientation they even praise it. It's quite common on Brazilian facebook accounts and movements speaches.

Sure anyone breaching ToS could/should be banned but that is also the freedom of the platform holder to do or not.

Anyway I'm more for letting people speak and show how imbecile they are instead of silencing them.

Any other hate speech and threats of violence should also be banned.  However, it is natural that people are more concerned with the President of the United states than random people on Facebook.

Sorry man, but the cases seem over here isn't of the importance of the person but the speach.

We have had people like Boulos and another two that are president of the Landless Workers, National Unions and Homeless Worker saying they middle class should be killed or that if Lula is jailed they will shoot down capitalists or throw brazil on fire, etc... they didn't get any flack on facebook. We have had famous singer saying police should be killed also not be moderated. While we have people saying "I don't like gay people" getting banned in less than 1h after the comment was made.

So the social medias aren't really complying with their ToS at all.