EricHiggin said:
Once again, Nin only own a minority portion. If PS were to get their hands on a majority, regardless of what deals they had to make, then Nin now has no choice but to work with and negotiate with PS. If this were to ever happen, Nin would basically be forced to put Pokemon on PS devices, because if they didn't, PS would just roadblock Nin at all corners and could even purposely run Pokemon into the ground. Then what happens once Nin's "savior" has been tarnished? This kind of thing happens all the time in big business, and while I don't see this ever happening, your point about Switch failing is what led us here. Smartphones and tablets are devices that have been out for years and have a proven record. Switch is a brand new concept and has no history or record, so assuming it will follow any upgrade standard is as wild as a guess as a PS portable. If you insist on following records, then either Switch 2 will fail just like how Wii U failed, or Nin will drop the hybrid idea and come out with something completely different. You've been told multiple times that the new Ryzen 2500u/2700u can meet those requirements, other than the price since we don't know what it would cost exactly in a few years. However, when you are asked to prove that a Switch 2 is on the way and that it will use an X3, your evidence is based solely on other products, which doesn't count, because if it did, then I can say the same thing and be equally as justified. |
If this is the case than how come there are still new Donkey Kong Country games on Nintendo Consoles if Rare was bought by Microsoft? Even if Sony hypothetically bought the rest of GameFreak, Nintendo can use another studio to make new Pokemon games. Retro did make DK Tropical Freeze (One of the best 2d platformers of all time).
