By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Teeqoz said:

C'mon Veknoid... What EA said is that their projected earnings for the entire fiscal 18 year won't be materially impacted by the temporary shutdown in microtransactions for Battlefront 2. For a company that makes about a billion dollars in profit each year, it's easy to believe that a short shutdown of microtransactions in a single title won't impact it too much, but that does little to disprove his claim...

Without full access to game budgets, we can't know for sure either way. In the absence of hard data to support either side, we're left with circumstantial evidence like that investor report. Maybe it doesn't disprove the claim, but has anyone, anywhere, proven it?

After catching EA, Activision, WB, et al. with their pants down, I'm going to remain skeptical. 

Let's just consider sony Shu saying from every 10 games they release 6 have loss, 2 break even and the 2 sucessfull pay for the other 6 and give profit.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."