TH3-D0S3R said:
I must of misunderstood the intial bolded quote where you said some probably do. I thought when you said that you were referring to atheists as a whole rather than those who did not understand atheism in general. Either way, coming from the other side, now that I know what you meant to say it seems pretty reasonable and fair. And like you said, it's hard to prove God as a whole. I believe he's there and don't tend to question beyond that, but I instead tend to question tendencies in right and wrong. I do mostly understand the sort of atheist view as a whole though. |
Well, the atheistic view ends on the question, do you believe in a god?
All that comes after that or even before that are the arguments and such. And they have nothing to do with atheism in itself, but rather with other positions which one is holding.
Meaning, there is no doctrine, no teaching, no goal, no answers, nothing in atheism. Everything else has to be found somewhere else. Most people go to science for these answers. Thus, people associate atheism with science. And thus they try to debunk or disprove atheism by attacking scientific theories. And that....fails all the time. Simply because a scientific theory is proven to be true and is supported by a huge amount of evidence.
Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | RTX 3090 FE| Crappy Monitor| HTC Vive Pro :3







