By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
yvanjean said:

You say that like I would ever want to play on PC :P there many gamers like me that only want the best possible console experience. The alternative to us is not PC, it would be not playing PUBG. You saw the Xbox one X specs, you know what the console can do, it's up to bluehole to get their shit together.  

Whether you play on PC or not is ultimately irrelevant, I don't actually care.
Just that the Xbox One version is shit and is in drastic need of improvement as it's not showing the hardware off fully.

And I am aware of what the Xbox One X can do, I do own that console.

Chazore said:

It's the complete opposite for me. If it's not decent on PC, I don't buy it . And I'm not the only one out there that thinks that either. 

Yeah. I wouldn't say it's worth it on PC either.
I bought it because I wanted to see the issues first hand and do some Memory, CPU and GPU time analysis.


So it is or isn't a computational resources hog?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."