By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sergiodaly said:
IkePoR said:

I said alien.  Not UFO.  I don't care about what you see in the sky, show me an alien.

At the end of the day, that's the argument.  Show some evidence.  Because the absence of evidence in this case is embarrassingly weak for anyone who believes it.

Ok. The thread was about ufo, and you mention alien as part of a quote, didn't realize you would only be satisfied by a photo of a alien instead of a ufo (the thread subject) 

My point still stands, the lack of photographic evidence is proof of nothing. Besides, photography only exists in 0.0000000000000000000000000001% (less actually but you get my point) of our existence in this planet, boosting the lack of evidence as irrelevant. The point is, we would only have evidence if they let us have it. I don't believe they ever come here, but I don't base my belief in weak arguments like lack of photography evidence. 

Notice how I don't mention photography in that last post.  Evidence exists in a million more ways than still images and video.  I used video and pictures in my last posts anecdotally, because that would be the first step of investigation - several people presenting photogenic evidence of something abnormal. 

So again, evidence.  Show me an alien.  Living in your attic, a severed limb, a piece of a ship or equipment, a dead one in a field.  SOMETHING to go off of besides tinfoil and "da gov-a-ment."



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"