JWeinCom said:
Slander is first of all spoken. So, it's definitely not slander. If anything it would be libel, but libel has to involve a public statement that damages someone's reputation. It doesn't apply to a private correspondence. Who the hell was Valve defaming the developer to. Themselves? Not to mention the statement would have to be proven false. And Valve's opinion is certainly reasonable. |
Not sure if you remember the cases of private conversations in USA that were taped and aired and still got the speakers to face judicial issues.
Prove that Valve statement is false? How and why would the dev prove it wasn't someone from Valve that made? And no, it isn't reasonable, unless you are in any position to claim this game is massively or marjorily consumed by pedophiles.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







