By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 20 December 2017
Edit Thread
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

So it shouldn't be accepted on the first place or it should have been communicated to the dev the changes needed. Also the accusatory last e-mail can lead then to sues.

Either way, it's not being accepted as an end result. Had they not accepted him beforehand, Ruler would have very much made the thread regardless and the same talks would still be going on.

I don't see him suing and winning millions from Valve. 

You think the dev can't win money from a sue from the Valve rep explicitily saying the game is aimed at pedophiles? And who make content to pedophiles? People that are also charged as pedophiles.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."