By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Otter said:
DonFerrari said:

Read the full OP to discover this game isn't what you think it is about.

point a camera to a real person inwards without approval is a crime. And I'm against censoring anything, but that have nothing to do with the point. Also I would appreciate you keeping insults out.

I shall also paraphrase a teacher of mine "the obvious is only obvious to the one that sees it", meaning that you may think something obvious, that isn't really obvious. And the meaning of the initial phrase is that you may be seeing harm and objectification because you are objectifying it.

And why would you do it to a virtual character? -_-

Why would you shoot someone in a game? Are you someone that shoot others in real life?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."