By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
DonFerrari said:

Understood, considering the company (I know about the other 2) then it must be quite good =] so you shouldn't have missed naming it.

 

I didn't miss naming it.  As I stated to Hoang, it was released in the US the year AFTER the Wii U launched.  I did not include that year because I only used up to the year of successor launch as that was the period we were discussing.  I grant that it is unusual for Nintendo to release a game on previous hardware after a successor has launched.  Pokemon Black and White 2 is another rare example (on DS instead of 3DS).

I was joking on the missing, I saw your answer to him. But since in Japan it released still on Wii last year it would qualify, but I understood your reasoning for not naming it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."