By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ruler said:
Otter said:

If you think sexualisation and fetishising someone requires literal sex or complete nudity you're being naive. Given the subject topic, the developers sure have gone out of the way to make their skirts as short as possible 



I mean come on guys lol, its pretty transparent the gaze this game is made from. Just read the character descriptions. One likes manipulating adults to her will and uses this presumably on the teacher, another loves breaking the school dresscode. Lets not act blind to context. 

First of all its you who sees it that way, i dont see anything sexual about that. And why hasnt valve contacted the devolopers back and asked him if he could remove some of the art or make changes? They obviously didnt, valve is the one whos shady here to me. 

To me that image is just like regular manga cover, and it's lovely and cute. The dev even contacted then to ask what should they remove/redo to get accepted.

They also had redone by their own and resubmitted, Valve just didn't want to listen.

Last edited by DonFerrari - on 19 December 2017

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."