eva01beserk said:
I think I got confused a moment but I am saying that it was not that noticeable. Like perma said, at the beginning you could say it was, but after its neglectable. |
Then I can't disagree with you, for me even going between PS4 and Pro the graphical difference doesn't bother me, although I "perceive" even if not side by side that Pro version is prettier.
Pemalite said:
I never made such an assertion.
That is because he is a tech enthusiast, just like myself.
Indeed. Although the Xbox One X will hit 4k more often than the Playstation 4 Pro, which is completely understandable with the faster hardware (And price tag to match.)
Ultimately the games speak for themselves. |
No doubt X1X is a superior HW compared to PS4Pro as much as PS4 was superior to X1 and PC ate all 4 for breakfast =]
If X1 had the games I want the 499 wouldn't be an issue for me, same way for PC that unfortunately is to expensive to put together in Brazil, doesn't have the exclusives that I like from Sony and unfortunately is almost pure digital. Would love to keep a 600-1000 USD gaming PC for 5 years playing all I want with cheaper game price.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







