| ClassicGamingWizzz said: Good on Valve, cleaning the weirdo weeb pedo shit from steam store. "This is a visual mystery novel for all gentleman and gentlewoman who love little girls!" They dont even hide it lmao |
Unless you go there and read the rest of OP and see that there is nothing relating to sex on this love.
AsGryffynn said:
I shall accept that if they remove all otoge as well... |
0 sexual content, already passed classification.
| Normchacho said: That's a very misleading thread title. Also, I'm not sure I agree with this particular game being removed, because I'm not sure there's any inappropriate content. But you have to admit that there are some Japanese games that sexualize girls (and boys) that are wwwaaayyy too young. P.s. Comparing games with pedophilia in them to shooters is god damn insane. |
If you think someone playing a game that have nudity of "naked child pixel" is a pedophile then you should also think someone playing a shooter is a mass shoter maniac right?
Otter said:
If you think sexualisation and fetishising someone requires literal sex or complete nudity you're being naive. Given the subject topic, the developers sure have gone out of the way to make their skirts as short as possible
|
You mean as if on your regular day there wouldn't be girls dressed like this and that the game already received a classification that it doesn't have sexual content (not talking about nudity or sex scenes only).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








