By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
DonFerrari said:

One of the talks from X1 higher ups said it was 4k60fps uncompromissed and several users here use that to claim X1X does really achieve that.

Yeah. Microsoft also advertised the Xbox One X as a "True 4k" console. Which was blatantly false.

eva01beserk said:

Most people could not even tell during the original ps4 and xbox launch. It was all basically according to what digital foundry said. And the difference they show have to be paused and zoom to see. Most don't do that.

The difference between the Playstation 4 and Xbox One was at it's largest on launch as Microsoft had reserved a chunk of GPU power for Kinect, it's drivers and API's were also less finely tuned.

And the games showed that, Xbox One games tended to have an extremely soft appearance with poor textures.


eva01beserk said:

It was not me who said it.

trust me, im on the look out for cgi. guy probably has a bunch of images saved and premade arguments for those who undermine graphics.

And I bet he only uses bullshot images as well, huh? *Hands out tinfoiled hats*


Mr Puggsly said:

We could theoretically have better AI and physics with the currents CPUs. I could argue last gen CPUs had more potential then we saw as well.

Physics can be moved to the GPU anyway.
GPU based Particles with lighting, shadowing and physics seems to be something that is gaining focus... Especially with Doom and Wolfenstein, that free's up the CPU to do other things at least.

Next gen will see a continuation of that trend with more tasks being done on the GPU.

Technarchy said:

The X1 is the the least technically capable console available and is 4 years old. The PS4, and increasingly, the PS4 Pro, are acting as a baseline for development. So new hardware is on the verge of being required to enjoy this generation of games without taking a sizable performance hit.

Depends on what aspect. CPU wise, the Xbox One is a step up over the Playstation 4.
The CPU not only has a higher clock rate, but the eSRAM and DDR3 reduced latency as well when fetching data outside of it's own caches.

GPU wise, it's no contest. - The Playstation 4 has a sizable advantage... Which is often reflected in higher resolutions, better texturing and higher quality post-process effects.

Makes me wonder how PUBG will run on the Playstation 4, the game is already a CPU hog and runs like crap on the Xbox One and Xbox One X and the Playstation 4 has the worst CPU this console generation.

So you admit that the was barely any difference after launch? 

I was not discrediting CGI, nor implying he makes stuff up, just saying he is passionate when it comes to graphics and that he would love the chance to debate the topic.

No thanks, I already have my own tinfoil hat Premium hat made in china by underage workers.



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.