VAMatt said:
I want no laws, strictly speaking. Rights don't come from government. I want all humans to enjoy all basic human rights. The only thing that government does is infringe upon them. |
Right then.
So a bloke breaks in your home in your dead of sleep, shoots you - because hey, anyone can just buy a gun without a licence because no laws - and steals all your belongings. Cause without a government, all those crimes are fair game. At this point, you'd better hope your closest ER is within crawling distance. Cause without a government, no taxes = no ambulance.
If you want the wild west, that's what life would be like. I don't think you want no laws, I think you want what everyone wants - big corporations to stop influencing laws. I think you want the government to be honest and look out for everyone it governs over, instead of fitting whatever agenda their owners pay them to fit.
Human rights are nice, but the flaw with "basic human rights" is the complexities of human interaction. Courts lived by "human rights" for a long time and you know where it got them? Beheadings, hangings, unfair trails, horrible jailing conditions, wrongful imprisonment, draconian prison sentences and the list goes on and on.
A government doesn't exclusively define laws. Laws are defined by societal moral codes. No laws means debaucherous self preservation, to the point where no moral value will exist. You want the benefit of human rights, after saying you want a society without morals. It sounds like you're a bit misguided or you have poorly established your world view.
Last edited by IkePoR - on 18 December 2017"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"
