PUGB on XB1 drops to 4fps, issues also on XB1X- Digital Foundry

[DonFerrari]

LudicrousSpeed said:
And that’s perfectly fine. Feel free to dismiss the game and have opinions on it without having played it. That’s normal. I just bought a Switch, because I like to own all consoles. I don’t need to play Sine Mora EX to know it’s not my type of game and that I wouldn’t enjoy it. Just like I don’t need to play GTS to know since it has a neutered upgrade system and no real traditional GT career mode and is extremely online focused, I wouldn’t get enough use out of it to warrant a purchase.

Where you differ though and where you fuck up is you go a step beyond that and not only form an opinion about how PUBG should play based entirely on videos of other people playing and impressions from other people playing, and you’re saying people who don’t mesh with the experience that suits your narrative are not being honest. Don’t try to act as if having an opinion on a game and calling people liars for not sharing your view on a game are remotely close to the same thing.

Personally I don’t really see how it’s against forum rules to call someone a fanboy yet it’s fine for you to say multiple people are liars just because of some stupid console warz agenda you have.

By the way, friend, I’m still waiting on that link to a post where I say someone is a liar because of their GTS experience LOL.

Neutered? Never heard that word. Is this about the upgrade system being a 3-4 tier upgrade for power and weight with percentage that you claim (and it looks like it) a mobile game system? I believe that was answered on that thread about it being kinda irrelevant because on the MP (that is the focus) there being automatic BP balance and locked out settings to make everyone race on same condition and not allow for tweaking and adjustment (which for the FIA championship is kinda mistake since being able to set up a car is part of competition, although for professionals usually the engineers do the set up and pilot test it and say the aspect of driving he need adjustment or the telemetric or whatever the name in english tells the issues).

Also I have no issue with you not wanting to buy GTS, a lot of previous players didn't want to buy because of the change of focus. But still it was advised it would be like this about a couple years prior and we also can't be sure (but is likely) that the SP campaign added bridge some of the gap.

Errr my English isn't the best, and I'm aware of it, but "how PUBG should play" wouldn't me setting the standards or expectations instead of observing how it's playing? And there is a difference between opinions and facts. As I said, on opinion level the idea of the game is great (not suited for me, but great. Same as I don't like Halo as a game because it isn't my type of game, but I accept it as one of the best shooters out there almost every single entry), I'm discussing the factual that everyone but you in here and on the comments pulled from outside VGC had some type of frame issues even outside of the pre-session. So as I said before if you said "I didn't notice a drop" or "the drop didn't bother me" I would hold zero issue with it since most drops in framerate doesn't bother me and some I don't notice. But your phrasing was more on line of they not existing and that is where I put you potentially lying about it.

Well you may discuss the forum rules with the mods, I personally don't mind anyone calling me a fanboy (because I do favor Sony), wouldn't mind anyone calling me a hater (although I don't hate MS or Nintendo, I'm either not interested in several of their offers, what is good not sufficing to pull me to them with my limited time although I own all platforms within time - MS and Nintendo usually with one gen gap). But the rules weren't made by me, still have to follow. If you think saying you are lying (and there is a difference between saying someone is saying a lie and calling him a liar). While at it, you won't ever stop pretending you are neutral and not doing console war and favoring MS?

I didn't claim you said anyone on GTS thread was lying, and even answered you before on this, that you phrased it in a way to not have evidence instead of all your posts made there without any experience but criticizing verification based on evidence here because some haven't played. A similar behavior to an acquaintance on another place that loves to put up links of news and when we give a general criticism or refute to the link he will throw a bravado about we not having read the link, and after we read and reiterate because it was basically what one already would expect being posted by him and looking the source and title and then he would drop the discussion on that post until the new link. Because I'm pretty certain that if I go and play it and see the bugs while playing (even if they are already evidenced by other posters you would disqualify the opinion.