By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
DonFerrari said:

You see a issue with someone having to enter Arcade, select the track and type of car but doesn't see a problem with changing HDD and turning off features of the console to make a game work... you really are precious. GTS have nothing to do with PUBG, but your behavior, the one you swear is neutral.

LOL

Are you really equating toggling off DVR so you can get a better frame rate to a game launching without staple features for its genre? And here I thought we’d already hit the bottom in terms of reaching in this thread, yet you just struck gold. We’re rich!

Allow me to help you understand. PUBG is in early access. It’s a $30 title. If people want to toggle off the DVR to increase performance, good on them. It’s optional. I don’t have issues with the performance outside of the lobby of the game, where it doesn’t even matter. No, as much as you’d like it to, that doesn’t equate to the idea that I can go in and create my own events and cups and career mode using single races in order to make up for missing content in a fully released $60 title. I mean, what’s next? If a story in a game sucks, can I tell someone to just make up their own? No, because that would be dumb as hell.

I'm even more surprised that you find it ok to have to solve issues on the game itself but not ok to have a game performed as advertised for over 2 years before release.

DonFerrari said:

Still I see no relevance to the point, is something like the sales determining the quality?

 

Well since you like making bad references to other threads, let me make a good one for you. In the case of GTS, you’re arguing right now in another thread that Sony doesn’t need to force any changes concerning Polyphony Digital because “the games sell”. Someone gave you some ideas on how Sony could make good changes to GT and your response was literally along the lines of “GT sells more so it must be better”.

So it would seem that yes, when it suits your argument, sales must obviously determine quality. 

You are really bad at analogies then.

I'm arguing that PD isn't subordinated to Sony in a way that Sony would demand they. They don't demand from studios directly below it like Sony Japan, ND, SSM, etc, so how exactly does it make sense to do it to PD? And I'm also arguing that why would they copy the control MS is doing on Turn 10 to improve sales (that was the point the other side was making) if their control have managed to make FM go down at every release since 3.

I never once said that GTS is better than any FM because it sell better, and you have the ludicrous audacity of say I'm the one reaching.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."