I still don't accept that research. I'll cut and paste it for you from the wiki:
The King James Version was translated by 47 scholars (although 54 were originally contracted) working in six committees, two based in each of the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, and Westminster. They worked on certain parts separately; then the drafts produced by each committee were compared and revised for harmony with each other. The scholars were not paid for their translation work, but were required to support themselves as best they could. Many were supported by the various colleges at Oxford and Cambridge.
Its well documented and there's no "possibility" of it at all being "written by Shakespeare."
I am not being presumptious; i'm questioning where you get your information. Isn't that something we should all do? Questioning what we know? If you get something simple like the King James Version wrong, how am I supposed to trust everything else?
Even your statement; "written by a man" is erroneous. Even if you didn't believe in the Bible's inspiration of God, you would know that the Bible itself isn't a single book, but rather a collection of 66 little books, written by over 40 men over a period of 1600 years.
I am familiar with the concept of evolution. I only ask that you are familiar with the Bible before you bash it.
